Systemically important organizations in the competition for government support

The paper covers the analysis of status systemically important organizations and review government support measures in comparison with international experience. principles differentiating various groups are specific for each country; typically, scale criterion industry used. Such selection becomes most relevant crisis periods, when immediate economy required. identification backbone has been used domestic practice since 2008, 2020, it was consolidated expanded, number increased at national regional levels. Moreover, author notes shift approach to organizations’ classification: broadening a “systemically important” status, complexity, transition industry-based approach. Funded bank credits special interest among measures. crediting mechanism involves both borrower creditor ministries agent. specifies risks this supporting measure related possible availability limitation other organizations. Bankruptcy moratorium is also specified as competitive environment counterfactor. Medium-scale enterprises became direct competitors obtaining concludes that ensures preference priority. study identified absence demand some from Alongside, included group occur. Additional requirements economic financial activities monitoring imposed. There being on sanction lists, which may limit circle organization’s potential counterparts. proposes changing grouping specifying priority, will ensure greater transparency objectivity providing groundwork tools improvement associated possibility restructuring allowable loans.